Patents and Online Bets
Written by Michael Coyle on 17 February 2007« Return to Reading Room
The Patents Court found this week that an invention relating to a method of placing online bets lay solely in the field of business methods, and so failed the third step in Aerotel/Macrossan as laid down in the Court of Appeal. Any such failure meant that the invention was excluded. The case Oneida Indian Nation  EWHC 954 (Pat), 2 May 2007 (Christopher Floyd QC).
Article 52(2) of the European Patent Convention (EPC) states that:
The following in particular shall not be regarded as inventions...
(c) schemes, rules and methods for performing mental acts, playing games or doing business, and
programs for computers;
(d) presentations of information.
The Court of Appeal, in Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd (and others) and Macrossan’s Application ( EWCA Civ 1371 (Aerotel); Approved the following four-step test for patentability under section 1(2):
- Properly construe the claim.
- Identify the actual contribution.
- Ask whether it falls solely within the excluded subject matter.
- Check whether the actual or alleged contribution is actually technical in nature.
Want to speak
Complete the form below and we’ll call you back free of charge.