Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Act 2017- What is it?
Written by Thomas Mould on 16 May 2017« Return to Reading Room
New law on unjustified threats of IP infringement enacted in the UK
Businesses unjustifiably accused of intellectual property (IP) rights infringements could be eligible for damages from rights holders under new legislation that has been enacted in the UK.
The Intellectual Property (Unjustified Threats) Act 2017 received Royal Assent on 27 April, however most of the provision will not come in to effect until further regulations are introduced by the government.
The new Act is an important piece of legislation that seeks to balance the right of IP owners to put companies on notice that they are suspected of infringing their IP rights with the right of businesses to be able to operate without being the subject of unjustified threats of court action if demands for payment in relation to spurious claims of infringement go unheeded.
The Act provides welcome statutory guidance by defining what communications constitute 'threats of infringement proceedings', as well as where those threats will be considered to qualify as threats that recipients can raise legal action against for each of patents, trade marks and designs.
The Act further sets out the characteristics of ‘permitted communications’, and offers rights holders a route to defend claims of unjustified threats in certain circumstances, including where infringement can be demonstrated. Where unjustified threats of infringement are found the act details potential remedies to those affected.
Until new regulations are passed to bring the majority of the provisions in the new Act into force, existing laws on 'groundless threats' will continue to apply.
Woods said that the current laws on groundless threats were developed over a period of time and apply slightly differently depending on whether the IP right in question is a patent, trade mark or design right.
The new Act, when it takes full effect will help to standardise these rules and simplify further complications that apply at the moment which relate to whether threats of legal action are made to suspected primary or secondary infringers.
Want to speak
Complete the form below and we’ll call you back free of charge.